Tippecanoe County
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.04)
- (7 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Overview (0.68)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.68)
- Law (1.00)
- Information Technology (0.93)
- Government (0.67)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.14)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.68)
- Banking & Finance > Trading (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Rule-Based Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Expert Systems (0.95)
- (4 more...)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.92)
- Workflow (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.68)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
ParaFuzz: An Interpretability-Driven Technique for Detecting Poisoned Samples in NLP
In this work, we propose an innovative test-time poisoned sample detection framework that hinges on the in-terpretability of model predictions, grounded in the semantic meaning of inputs. We contend that triggers (e.g., infrequent words) are not supposed to fundamentally alter the underlying semantic meanings of poisoned samples as they want to
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.05)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.05)
- Asia > Nepal (0.04)
Frequentist Regret Analysis of Gaussian Process Thompson Sampling via Fractional Posteriors
Roy, Somjit, Jaiswal, Prateek, Bhattacharya, Anirban, Pati, Debdeep, Mallick, Bani K.
We study Gaussian Process Thompson Sampling (GP-TS) for sequential decision-making over compact, continuous action spaces and provide a frequentist regret analysis based on fractional Gaussian process posteriors, without relying on domain discretization as in prior work. We show that the variance inflation commonly assumed in existing analyses of GP-TS can be interpreted as Thompson Sampling with respect to a fractional posterior with tempering parameter $α\in (0,1)$. We derive a kernel-agnostic regret bound expressed in terms of the information gain parameter $γ_t$ and the posterior contraction rate $ε_t$, and identify conditions on the Gaussian process prior under which $ε_t$ can be controlled. As special cases of our general bound, we recover regret of order $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{\frac{1}{2}})$ for the squared exponential kernel, $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{\frac{2ν+3d}{2(2ν+d)}} )$ for the Matérn-$ν$ kernel, and a bound of order $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{\frac{2ν+3d}{2(2ν+d)}})$ for the rational quadratic kernel. Overall, our analysis provides a unified and discretization-free regret framework for GP-TS that applies broadly across kernel classes.
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.14)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.14)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Kanagawa Prefecture (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Evanston (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Sports (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games > Computer Games (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.93)
- (3 more...)